Pahalgam Terror Attack: A Tragic Blow to Kashmir’s Tourism and India’s Financial Markets
Pahalgam Terror Attack: A Tragic Blow to Kashmir’s Tourism and India’s Financial Markets
On April 22, 2025, a devastating terror attack shook the serene valley of Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, targeting tourists in the picturesque Baisaran meadow, often dubbed “mini Switzerland.” The attack, which claimed 26-28 lives, including Indian and foreign nationals, has been labeled one of the deadliest in the region since the 2019 Pulwama attack. Attributed to The Resistance Front, a shadow group linked to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, the incident has sparked widespread outrage, escalated India-Pakistan tensions, and sent ripples through India’s tourism industry and financial markets. This comprehensive news blog explores the details of the attack, the Indian government’s response, global reactions, and the far-reaching consequences, particularly on the financial markets, businesses, and the stock market.
The Pahalgam Terror Attack: What Happened?
The attack occurred on a Tuesday morning when a group of seven terrorists, including suspected Pakistani nationals, opened fire on unsuspecting tourists in Baisaran, a popular meadow approximately five kilometers from Pahalgam town. The assailants, dressed in fatigues, fired for 25-30 minutes, leaving 26-28 people dead, including two foreign nationals and several Indian tourists from states like Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Haryana. Among the victims were a newlywed Indian Navy officer, Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, and a Kanpur-based chartered accountant, Shubham Dwivedi, whose tragic deaths underscored the personal toll of the attack.
Eyewitness accounts paint a harrowing picture. A survivor recounted to India Today how a gunman shot her husband, while another tourist described the chaos as people ran for their lives, screaming amidst gunfire. Videos circulating on social media captured the panic, with tourists fleeing the meadow as shots rang out. The attack, described by former Jammu and Kashmir Police chief Shesh Paul Vaid as a “Pulwama 2.0 moment,” targeted civilians based on their faith, drawing comparisons to the Hamas-style assault on Israel in October 2023.
The Resistance Front claimed responsibility, intensifying scrutiny on Pakistan’s alleged role. Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied involvement, extending condolences, but India’s government pointed to cross-border linkages, prompting swift and decisive action.

Indian Government’s Response: A Multi-Pronged Approach
The Indian government responded with a combination of security, diplomatic, and economic measures, signaling a zero-tolerance stance on terrorism. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who cut short his visit to Saudi Arabia, condemned the attack as an assault on the “soul of India” and vowed to punish the perpetrators “beyond their imagination.” The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), chaired by Modi, met on April 22 to strategize, followed by an all-party meeting on April 24 to ensure national unity.
Security Measures
-
Enhanced Security in Kashmir: The Indian Army, CRPF, and Jammu and Kashmir Police launched a joint combing operation within a five-kilometer radius of Baisaran, aiming to apprehend the attackers. Security was beefed up across the Kashmir Valley, with increased patrolling in Srinagar and other tourist hubs.
-
NIA Involvement: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) dispatched a team to Pahalgam to assist local police in the probe. Sketches of three suspected terrorists were released to aid the manhunt.
-
High-Level Reviews: Union Home Minister Amit Shah visited Srinagar on April 22 for a security review, emphasizing that the perpetrators would not be spared. Intelligence Bureau Director Tapan Deka and R&AW chief Ravi Sinha attended follow-up meetings to assess national security.
Diplomatic and Economic Actions
India’s response extended beyond security, targeting Pakistan’s infrastructure and diplomatic presence:
-
Suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty: India announced the abeyance of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, a move Pakistan declared an “act of war.” This decision, aimed at pressuring Pakistan, could impact water flow for irrigation in Pakistan’s Punjab province.
-
Closure of Attari Border: The Attari-Wagah border was shut immediately, halting cross-border movement. Twenty-eight Pakistani nationals left India, and 105 Indian nationals returned from Pakistan.
-
Visa Cancellations: India canceled visas for Pakistani nationals, ordering them to leave within 48 hours. Pakistani defense officials were given a week to exit.
-
Reduced Diplomatic Ties: India scaled back diplomatic engagement with Pakistan, further isolating Islamabad on the global stage.
-
Airspace Restrictions: Pakistan retaliated by closing its airspace to Indian airlines, forcing Air India and IndiGo to reroute international flights, increasing operational costs.

Financial and Social Support
-
Compensation and Relief: The Uttar Pradesh government announced Rs 50 lakh and a job for the family of Shubham Dwivedi. Gujarat offered Rs 5 lakh to its residents killed in the attack. The Life Insurance Corporation of India relaxed claim settlement procedures for victims’ families.
-
Corporate Initiatives: PB Fintech, parent company of Policybazaar, established a foundation to support affected families, reflecting corporate solidarity.
The all-party meeting, attended by leaders like Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, and J.P. Nadda, adopted a resolution condemning the attack as an “assault on Kashmiriyat and the idea of India.” Rahul Gandhi, who visited injured victims in Anantnag on April 25, assured the government of the opposition’s full support.
Global Reactions: A Chorus of Condemnation
The attack drew widespread condemnation from world leaders, reflecting global solidarity with India:
-
United States: President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, who was in India during the attack, expressed unwavering support, with Trump stating, “The United States stands firmly with India against terrorism.”
-
Russia: President Vladimir Putin called the attack a “brutal crime” with “no justification,” offering condolences to the victims’ families.
-
Israel: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the attack as “barbaric,” pledging Israel’s support in India’s fight against terrorism.
-
United Kingdom: Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy and Prime Minister Keir Starmer observed a moment of silence, expressing “deepest sympathies.”
-
Other Nations: Leaders from Iran, Italy, the UAE, and France, including President Emmanuel Macron, condemned the attack, emphasizing solidarity and the need to combat terrorism.
The United Nations urged India and Pakistan to exercise “maximum restraint” to prevent further escalation, highlighting the global stakes of the incident.

Impact on Kashmir’s Tourism Industry
Pahalgam, a key destination along the Amarnath Yatra route, is central to Jammu and Kashmir’s tourism-driven economy. The attack has cast a shadow over the region’s booming tourism sector, which was gaining momentum during the 2025 trekking season. A nationwide survey revealed that 60% of families with travel plans to Kashmir canceled their bookings, with respondents citing safety concerns.
Hospitality industry players fear a prolonged downturn, as the attack has sown fear among domestic and international tourists. An officer quoted by ANI noted a significant drop in tourist numbers, with local livelihoods—dependent on tourism—facing severe disruption. Despite this, some tourists, like two women from Maharashtra interviewed by NDTV, expressed trust in local Kashmiris and vowed to continue exploring the region, highlighting the resilience of community bonds.
The attack’s timing, coinciding with US Vice President JD Vance’s visit and Prime Minister Modi’s Saudi Arabia trip, amplified its geopolitical impact, potentially deterring foreign visitors further.

Financial Market and Business Consequences
The Pahalgam attack has reverberated through India’s financial markets, businesses, and stock market, exacerbating existing economic concerns and creating new challenges.
Stock Market Volatility
The Indian stock market, sensitive to geopolitical tensions, experienced immediate turbulence. The BSE Sensex and NSE Nifty indices saw sharp declines on April 23 and 24, driven by investor concerns over India-Pakistan tensions and their economic implications. Sectors like tourism, aviation, and hospitality were hit hardest:
-
Tourism and Hospitality Stocks: Companies like Indian Hotels Company (Taj Hotels), EIH Ltd. (Oberoi Hotels), and Lemon Tree Hotels saw their stock prices drop by 5-8% in the days following the attack, reflecting fears of reduced tourist inflows to Kashmir and other destinations.
-
Aviation Sector: Air India and IndiGo, impacted by Pakistan’s airspace closure, faced increased operational costs due to longer flight routes. Their stock prices dipped by 3-5%, with analysts warning of sustained pressure if tensions persist.
-
Insurance Sector: The Life Insurance Corporation of India’s announcement of relaxed claim settlements for victims led to a slight uptick in its stock price, as investors viewed the move as a positive signal of corporate responsibility.
Pakistan’s KSE-100 index also plummeted, closing at 115,019.81 on April 24, down 2,206.33 points, as tensions with India weighed on investor sentiment.

Business Disruptions
-
Tourism-Dependent Businesses: Travel agencies, tour operators, and local businesses in Kashmir, such as pony guides and hoteliers, face significant revenue losses. The cancellation of bookings has ripple effects on ancillary sectors like handicrafts and food services, which rely heavily on tourist spending.
-
Trade and Markets: Leading trade associations in Delhi called for a complete market shutdown on April 25 as a mark of solidarity, disrupting retail and wholesale activities in the capital. This symbolic gesture, while impactful, added to short-term economic losses.
-
Corporate Responses: Companies like PB Fintech took proactive steps to support victims’ families, but the broader business community remains cautious. Multinational corporations with operations in India are closely monitoring the situation, with some revising travel advisories for employees.
Macro-Economic Implications
The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and the closure of the Attari border have broader economic implications:
-
Trade Disruptions: The Attari border closure halts bilateral trade, limited though it was, affecting exporters and importers on both sides. India’s decision to reduce diplomatic ties could further strain economic relations, impacting cross-border investments.
-
Water Resource Tensions: The Indus Waters Treaty suspension raises concerns about agricultural productivity in Pakistan, which could indirectly affect India through regional instability. In India, the move is seen as a strategic leverage point but carries risks of international backlash.
-
Foreign Investment: Foreign investors, already wary of geopolitical risks in South Asia, may adopt a wait-and-see approach, potentially slowing foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows into India. The tourism sector, a significant contributor to India’s GDP, could see reduced foreign exchange earnings.
Analysts predict that while the immediate market reaction has been sharp, the long-term impact will depend on the duration of India-Pakistan tensions and the government’s ability to restore confidence in Kashmir’s safety.
Public Sentiment and Protests
The attack sparked widespread grief and anger across India. Candlelight marches were held in Baramulla, Srinagar, Poonch, and Kupwara, while Bajrang Dal workers protested in Jammu. In Delhi, locals expressed solidarity through market shutdowns, and in Gujarat, the widow of victim Shailesh Kalathiya confronted politicians, highlighting the public’s frustration.
Social media platforms, particularly X, buzzed with reactions. Posts from accounts like @MeghUpdates and @ANI highlighted the government’s decisive actions, such as the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, which garnered significant public support. However, some users criticized the government’s handling of security in Kashmir, reflecting a polarized sentiment.
The Road Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities
The Pahalgam terror attack has exposed vulnerabilities in Kashmir’s security apparatus and underscored the fragility of India-Pakistan relations. Moving forward, India faces several challenges:
-
Restoring Tourist Confidence: The government must invest in visible security measures and public relations campaigns to reassure tourists. Collaborations with travel influencers and international tourism boards could help rebuild Kashmir’s image as a safe destination.
-
Economic Stabilization: The Reserve Bank of India and the Finance Ministry may need to introduce measures to stabilize markets, such as liquidity support for affected sectors like aviation and tourism. Incentives for domestic tourism could mitigate losses.
-
Diplomatic Balancing Act: While India’s actions against Pakistan have domestic support, they risk international criticism. Engaging with allies like the US, Israel, and the UAE will be crucial to maintain global backing.
On the opportunity side, the attack has unified India’s political spectrum, providing a platform for cohesive national policies on counter-terrorism. Corporate initiatives, like PB Fintech’s foundation, could inspire broader public-private partnerships to support affected communities.
Conclusion
The Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, 2025, is a tragic milestone in Jammu and Kashmir’s history, with profound implications for India’s security, economy, and international relations. The Indian government’s swift response—ranging from security operations to diplomatic measures—reflects a resolute stance against terrorism. However, the attack’s impact on Kashmir’s tourism industry, financial markets, and businesses highlights the need for strategic interventions to restore confidence and stability. As India navigates the aftermath, the focus must be on justice for the victims, economic recovery, and long-term peace in the region. The resilience of Kashmir’s people, coupled with national and global solidarity, offers hope amidst the tragedy. For investors, businesses, and policymakers, the challenge lies in turning this crisis into an opportunity for renewal and strength.